On 19 February 2014 15:13, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:43:19AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> Adding ST people as well who have access to boards and are working on SPEAr. >> >> On 18 February 2014 23:27, Russell King - ARM Linux >> <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > 1) You're controlling the card power GPIO via the insertion/removal >> > interrupt handler? What's wrong with using a vmmc regulator for >> > that, which will be controlled via the MMC subsystem as required? >> >> Haven't explored that earlier.. Maybe its possible but no idea. >> The requirements were like this: >> - We may or maynot need a GPIO for controlling power >> - If we need it, we may need to disable/enable power with card removal/ >> insertion Or we may need to keep it enabled for ever.. > > So how is this any different from any other system which controls power to > the MMC/SD socket? I am not claiming it to be different. I am just saying these were the requirements and I am not sure if they were satisfied with vmmc regulator. It might be exactly same in all other platforms. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
