Re: brcm 4329 problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11 February 2014 08:33, Dong Aisheng <dongas86@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 02:50:42PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
>>> <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> > On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 08:59:17PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>> >> On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 10:05:13AM +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>>> >> > Yeah. I did not mention this, but indeed the first log you provided
>>> >> > already made that clear (to me). In your last log the driver sends an UP
>>> >> > command to the firmware on which no response is given. So I was hoping
>>> >> > the forensics file (which is firmware console buffer) would show an
>>> >> > error message of some kind. Also that is not the case. Have to come up
>>> >> > with new ideas about what is going wrong here.
>>> >>
>>> >> I'm chasing a theory at the moment, but it's being complicated by the
>>> >> driver oopsing on unload...
>>> >
>>> > Theory proven.
>>> >
>>> > May I first take the time to apologise to Arend for wasting his time with
>>> > this issue; the issue is not the Broadcom driver, but the SDHCI driver.
>>> >
>>> > My theory was that it's the sdhci driver causing the problems...  My
>>> > suspicions were first raised when I read through various SDHCI driver
>>> > functions such as the set_ios methods when chasing down a problem with
>>> > UHS-1 SD cards, and later when I was reading it's interrupt handling
>>> > code.
>>> >
>>> > The driver looks very much like a patchwork quilt of different hacks,
>>> > all trying to co-operate with each other in the semblence of something
>>> > working - the result is something which does stuff in ways that the SD
>>> > card spec doesn't allow, but also does some pretty stupid things when
>>> > you have a SDIO device attached.
>>> >
>>> > The SDIO problems become pretty obvious when you see this log:
>>> >
>>> > [   51.112923] brcmfmac: brcmf_fil_cmd_int_set cmd=2, value=0
>>> > [   51.112937] brcmfmac: brcmf_proto_bcdc_set_dcmd Enter, cmd 2 len 4
>>> > [   51.112946] brcmfmac: brcmf_proto_bcdc_msg Enter
>>> > [   51.112981] brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_bus_sleep request WAKE currently WAKE
>>> > [   51.112989] brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_clkctl Enter
>>> > [   51.113498] brcmfmac: brcmf_proto_bcdc_cmplt Enter
>>> > [   51.128501] brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_bus_watchdog idle
>>> > [   51.128522] brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_bus_sleep request SLEEP currently WAKE
>>> > [   51.128532] brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_clkctl Enter
>>> > [   51.128540] brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_htclk Enter
>>> > [   51.128549] brcmfmac: brcmf_sdiod_regwb addr:0x0001000e, data:0x00
>>> > [   51.128560] brcmfmac: brcmf_sdiod_request_data rw=1, func=1, addr=0x1000e, nbytes=1
>>> > [   51.128645] brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_htclk CLKCTL: turned OFF
>>> > [   51.128655] brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_sdclk Enter
>>> > [   51.128667] brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_clkctl 3 -> 0
>>> > [   51.180385] mmc0: runtime suspend
>>> > [   53.112272] brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_bus_rxctl: resumed on timeout
>>> > [   53.118290] brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_bus_sleep request WAKE currently WAKE
>>> > [   53.118302] brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_clkctl Enter
>>> > [   53.118312] brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_sdclk Enter
>>> > [   53.118319] brcmfmac: brcmf_sdio_htclk Enter
>>> > [   53.118329] brcmfmac: brcmf_sdiod_regwb addr:0x0001000e, data:0x10
>>> > [   53.118341] brcmfmac: brcmf_sdiod_request_data rw=1, func=1, addr=0x1000e, nbytes=1
>>> > [   53.118537] sdhci-esdhc-imx 2190000.usdhc: desired SD clock: 50000000, actual: 49500000
>>> > [   53.118550] mmc0: esdhc_pltfm_set_clock: CLK on
>>> > [   53.119723] sdhci-esdhc-imx 2190000.usdhc: change pinctrl state for uhs 0
>>> > [   53.125880] mmc0: sdio irq enabled: 007f0003 007f0003
>>> > [   53.125898] mmc0: runtime resume
>>> > [   53.125910] mmc0: card irq raised
>>> > [   53.125925] mmc0: sdio irq disabled: 007f0103 007f0103
>>> > [   53.126030] brcmfmac: brcmf_sdiod_regrb addr:0x0001000e
>>> > [   53.126055] brcmfmac: brcmf_sdiod_request_data rw=0, func=1, addr=0x1000e, nbytes=1
>>> >
>>> > The values printed in "sdio irq *abled" are the INT_ENABLE and SIGNAL_ENABLE
>>> > register values immediately before the stated action is taken bit 8 is
>>> > the interrupt enable for card interrupts.  Earlier in the log, SDIO card
>>> > interrupts were enabled (one was handled immediately before the above
>>> > broadcom cmd=2 message was sent.
>>> >
>>> > Yep, that's right - at 51.180385, the SDIO host has /all/ interrupts
>>> > disabled by a runtime suspend - including any interrupt from the card.
>>> > The brcmfmac driver times out after 2 seconds having sent the "up"
>>> > command, and re-awakens the host, which is runtime resumed at 53.125898,
>>> > enabling the SDIO card interrupt at that time.
>>> >
>>> > And lo and behold - the card has an interrupt pending!  Too bad, we're
>>> > too late for the driver to forward the interrupt to the SDIO interrupt
>>> > thread and get it to the driver before the time-out is processed.
>>> >
>>> > Here's the proof - the above messages came from:
>>> >
>>> > int sdhci_runtime_suspend_host(struct sdhci_host *host)
>>> > {
>>> >         unsigned long flags;
>>> >         int ret = 0;
>>> >
>>> > printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: runtime suspend\n",
>>> >         mmc_hostname(host->mmc));
>>> > ...
>>> >         spin_lock_irqsave(&host->lock, flags);
>>> >         sdhci_mask_irqs(host, SDHCI_INT_ALL_MASK);
>>> >         spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
>>> >
>>> > int sdhci_runtime_resume_host(struct sdhci_host *host)
>>> > {
>>> >         unsigned long flags;
>>> >         int ret = 0, host_flags = host->flags;
>>> > ...
>>> >         /* Enable SDIO IRQ */
>>> >         if ((host->flags & SDHCI_SDIO_IRQ_ENABLED))
>>> >                 sdhci_enable_sdio_irq_nolock(host, true);
>>> >
>>> >         /* Enable Card Detection */
>>> >         sdhci_enable_card_detection(host);
>>> >
>>> > printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: runtime resume\n",
>>> >         mmc_hostname(host->mmc));
>>> >         spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
>>> >
>>> >         return ret;
>>> > }
>>> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sdhci_runtime_resume_host);
>>> >
>>> > To me, it looks like SDHCI needs a major rework...  And there needs to
>>> > be some recognition that - maybe - leaving SDIO interrupts enabled even
>>> > though we may want the host to enter a low power mode is something that's
>>> > really very very desirable...
>>> >
>>>
>>> I'm not quite clear about your issue.
>>> But it seems your issue is caused by runtime pm disabling the
>>> interrupt & clocks as you said.
>>>
>>> Can you try the patch i mentioned here:
>>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mmc/msg24764.html
>>>
>>> That will prevent the host to do runtime pm for SDIO devices.
>>
>> Why not allow runtime PM at the host level, but still allow the
>> interrupt to be received?  Doesn't it make sense to allow PM even with
>> SDIO cards in place?
>>
>
> It depends on both host and card that 1) if host is able to detect
> SDIO interrupts without clock
> and 2) if the card is able to send interrupt to host without clock.
> If any one of both can't do that, we may need to tell host to not
> do runtime suspend to prevent the clock from being disabled.
> Or the SDIO interrupt may not work.
>
> The IMX esdhc/usdhc can not detect the SDIO interrupts sent from card
> if the clock is disabled.

So you are saying you have no option to reroute the DAT1 line to a
GPIO irq, right? I guess that would be SOC specific.

> So we need such quirk to not allow runtime PM for SDIO cards.
> Doesn't it make sense?

Yes, I think so. But, maybe it should be configurable to use it?

Kind regards
Uffe

>
> Regards
> Dong Aisheng
>
>> Once I get imx-drm off my plate, I'm going to put some work into
>> rewriting the sdhci driver mess in a much cleaner way - we can't go on
>> putting hacks on top of what's already there, it's already a total mess.
>>
>> --
>> FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: 5.8Mbps down 500kbps up.  Estimation
>> in database were 13.1 to 19Mbit for a good line, about 7.5+ for a bad.
>> Estimate before purchase was "up to 13.2Mbit".
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux