On 12/17/2013 01:04 AM, dinguyen@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@xxxxxxxxxx>
+static int socfpga_clk_prepare(struct clk_hw *hwclk)
+{
+ struct socfpga_clk *socfpgaclk = to_socfpga_clk(hwclk);
+ struct regmap *sys_mgr_base_addr;
+ u32 hs_timing;
+
+ if (socfpgaclk->clk_phase[0] || socfpgaclk->clk_phase[1]) {
+ sys_mgr_base_addr = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible("altr,sys-mgr");
+ if (IS_ERR(sys_mgr_base_addr)) {
+ pr_err("%s: failed to find altr,sys-mgr regmap!\n", __func__);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ hs_timing = SYSMGR_SDMMC_CTRL_SET(socfpgaclk->clk_phase[0],
+ socfpgaclk->clk_phase[1]);
+ regmap_write(sys_mgr_base_addr, SYSMGR_SDMMCGRP_CTRL_OFFSET,
+ hs_timing);
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
So reusing gate-clk here and check the node of "altr,sys-mgr".
I think it is good and simple.
Also can define new clock combined with node "altr,sys-mgr" with parent
of sdmmc_clk.
Thanks for the update, it is fine to me.
+
static struct clk_ops gateclk_ops = {
+ .prepare = socfpga_clk_prepare,
.recalc_rate = socfpga_clk_recalc_rate,
.get_parent = socfpga_clk_get_parent,
.set_parent = socfpga_clk_set_parent,
@@ -254,6 +283,7 @@ static void __init socfpga_gate_clk_init(struct device_node *node,
{
u32 clk_gate[2];
u32 div_reg[3];
+ u32 clk_phase[2];
u32 fixed_div;
struct clk *clk;
struct socfpga_clk *socfpga_clk;
@@ -294,6 +324,12 @@ static void __init socfpga_gate_clk_init(struct device_node *node,
socfpga_clk->div_reg = 0;
}
+ rc = of_property_read_u32_array(node, "clk-phase", clk_phase, 2);
+ if (!rc) {
+ socfpga_clk->clk_phase[0] = clk_phase[0];
+ socfpga_clk->clk_phase[1] = clk_phase[1];
+ }
+
of_property_read_string(node, "clock-output-names", &clk_name);
init.name = clk_name;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
