On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 09:20:10PM -0800, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > > Hi Simon > > > > > > These are v2 of SDHI support for r8a7790. > > > > > > > > > > Kuninori Morimoto (2): > > > > > ARM: shmobile: lager: add gpio/fixed regulator for SDHI > > > > > ARM: shmobile: lager: add SDHI0/2 support > > > > > > > > > > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-lager.c | 149 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > > > > > > > Hi Morimoto-san, > > > > > > > > I assume that these two patches depend on at least > > > > some of the first 14 patches. Is that correct? > > > > > > Compile itself is not depend on first 14 patches, > > > but, it doesn't work correctly without these patches. > > > So, yes, it depend on 14 patches. > > > > What is the run-time effect of these 2 patches without the other 14. > > Is it > > > > a) Things get worse and will only get better with the other 14 patches or; > > b) Things stay the same and will get better with the other 14 patches? > > > > In the case of b I am inclined to queue these patches up once/if > > Chris has indicated that the other 14 patches are ok. > > > > In the case of a I would like to wait and queue up these patches > > on top of the other 14 patches once/if they are available in a > > stable branch. > > Thank you. I think b) > But, my current plan is that I will re-send these patches > again in good-timing (when I can indicate the necessary branch). > I guess it doesn't have complex relationship. > What do you think ? Sure, that is fine for me. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
