When reading CAP_1 register for mx6sl, ignore bit[0-15] as it stores
CAP_2 register value which is new introduced in mx6sl.
Without this fix, the max clock for mx6sl may not be correct since
it's wrongly calculated by reading CAP_1 register.
Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <b29396@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 4 ++++
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
index a4e0e3b..52c0760 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
@@ -226,6 +226,10 @@ static u32 esdhc_readl_le(struct sdhci_host *host, int reg)
}
if (unlikely(reg == SDHCI_CAPABILITIES)) {
+ /* ignore bit[0-15] as it stores cap_1 register val for mx6sl */
+ if (imx_data->socdata->flags & ESDHC_FLAG_HAVE_CAP1)
+ val &= 0xffff0000;
+
/* In FSL esdhc IC module, only bit20 is used to indicate the
* ADMA2 capability of esdhc, but this bit is messed up on
* some SOCs (e.g. on MX25, MX35 this bit is set, but they
--
1.7.2.rc3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
