Hi Fabio,
Am 18.09.2013 02:06, schrieb Fabio Estevam:
Hi Dirk,
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Dirk,
I have adapted your patch at:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-July/111022.html
and tested it on 3.12-rc1 on a mx6qsabresd board.
Do you have plans to submit it? Maybe as a RFC?
It solves the mmcblkX order issue on my tests and it would be nice we
could have this problem addressed.
I simplied your patch a bit:
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
index 1a3163f..94f842b 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
@@ -2026,7 +2026,7 @@ static struct mmc_blk_data
*mmc_blk_alloc_req(struct mmc_card *card,
struct mmc_blk_data *md;
int devidx, ret;
- devidx = find_first_zero_bit(dev_use, max_devices);
+ devidx = find_next_zero_bit(dev_use, max_devices, card->host->devidx);
if (devidx >= max_devices)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC);
__set_bit(devidx, dev_use);
@@ -2044,7 +2044,8 @@ static struct mmc_blk_data
*mmc_blk_alloc_req(struct mmc_card *card,
* index anymore so we keep track of a name index.
*/
if (!subname) {
- md->name_idx = find_first_zero_bit(name_use, max_devices);
+ md->name_idx = find_next_zero_bit(name_use, max_devices,
+ card->host->devidx);
__set_bit(md->name_idx, name_use);
} else
md->name_idx = ((struct mmc_blk_data *)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
index abc8cf0..e11a6af 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
@@ -524,8 +524,9 @@ static int sdhci_esdhc_imx_probe(struct
platform_device *pdev)
struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host;
struct sdhci_host *host;
struct esdhc_platform_data *boarddata;
- int err;
+ int err, ret;
struct pltfm_imx_data *imx_data;
+ struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
host = sdhci_pltfm_init(pdev, &sdhci_esdhc_imx_pdata, 0);
if (IS_ERR(host))
@@ -602,6 +603,13 @@ static int sdhci_esdhc_imx_probe(struct
platform_device *pdev)
host->mmc->parent->platform_data);
}
+
+ if (np) {
+ ret = of_alias_get_id(np, "mmcblk");
+ if (ret >= 0)
+ host->mmc->devidx = ret;
+ }
+
/* write_protect */
if (boarddata->wp_type == ESDHC_WP_GPIO) {
err = mmc_gpio_request_ro(host->mmc, boarddata->wp_gpio);
diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
index 3b0c33a..8209f72 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
@@ -362,6 +362,8 @@ struct mmc_host {
unsigned int slotno; /* used for sdio acpi binding */
+ /* preferred mmc block device index (mmcblkX) */
+ unsigned int devidx;
unsigned long private[0] ____cacheline_aligned;
};
What do you think?
Do you like to send this as a proper patch? Following the recent
discussion it sounds to me that there is really some need for
something like this. Then we could discuss the technical details.
Best regards
Dirk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
