On 09/17/2013 12:04 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Dirk, > > I have adapted your patch at: > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-July/111022.html > > and tested it on 3.12-rc1 on a mx6qsabresd board. > > Do you have plans to submit it? Maybe as a RFC? > > It solves the mmcblkX order issue on my tests and it would be nice we > could have this problem addressed. Patches to make mmc block devices have static names have been proposed in the past and rejected. I think the main reason is that the block device names are (or can be) dynamic, so anything that assumes a particular naming scheme is simply broken. The correct solution is to use e.g. root=UUID=xxx or root=PARTUUID=xxx, or similar techniques for other filesystems (e.g. /etc/fstab) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
