On Wed, August 28, 2013, Yuvaraj Kumar C D wrote:
> Exynos5420 Mobile Storage Host controller has Security Management Unit
> (SMU) for channel 0 and channel 1 (mainly for eMMC).This patch configures
> SMU for exynos5420.
>
> This patch is on top of the below patch by Doug Anderson.
> mmc: dw_mmc: Add exynos resume_noirq callback to clear WAKEUP_INT
>
> changes since V2:
> 1.Droppped the bypass-smu quirk.
> 2.Changed the subject line for this patch
> add a quirk for SMU -> configure SMU in exynos5420
>
> changes since V1:
> 1.avoid code duplication by calling dw_mci_exynos_priv_init in
> resume path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yuvaraj Kumar C D <yuvaraj.cd@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
> index 19c845b..db28f10 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,25 @@
> #define EXYNOS4210_FIXED_CIU_CLK_DIV 2
> #define EXYNOS4412_FIXED_CIU_CLK_DIV 4
>
> +/* Block number in eMMC */
> +#define DWMCI_BLOCK_NUM 0xFFFFFFFF
> +
> +#define SDMMC_EMMCP_BASE 0x1000
> +#define SDMMC_MPSECURITY (SDMMC_EMMCP_BASE + 0x0010)
> +#define SDMMC_MPSBEGIN0 (SDMMC_EMMCP_BASE + 0x0200)
> +#define SDMMC_MPSEND0 (SDMMC_EMMCP_BASE + 0x0204)
> +#define SDMMC_MPSCTRL0 (SDMMC_EMMCP_BASE + 0x020C)
> +
> +/* SMU control bits */
> +#define DWMCI_MPSCTRL_SECURE_READ_BIT BIT(7)
> +#define DWMCI_MPSCTRL_SECURE_WRITE_BIT BIT(6)
> +#define DWMCI_MPSCTRL_NON_SECURE_READ_BIT BIT(5)
> +#define DWMCI_MPSCTRL_NON_SECURE_WRITE_BIT BIT(4)
> +#define DWMCI_MPSCTRL_USE_FUSE_KEY BIT(3)
> +#define DWMCI_MPSCTRL_ECB_MODE BIT(2)
> +#define DWMCI_MPSCTRL_ENCRYPTION BIT(1)
> +#define DWMCI_MPSCTRL_VALID BIT(0)
> +
> /* Variations in Exynos specific dw-mshc controller */
> enum dw_mci_exynos_type {
> DW_MCI_TYPE_EXYNOS4210,
> @@ -74,6 +93,15 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_priv_init(struct dw_mci *host)
> {
> struct dw_mci_exynos_priv_data *priv = host->priv;
>
> + if (priv->ctrl_type == DW_MCI_TYPE_EXYNOS5420) {
> + mci_writel(host, MPSBEGIN0, 0);
> + mci_writel(host, MPSEND0, DWMCI_BLOCK_NUM);
> + mci_writel(host, MPSCTRL0, DWMCI_MPSCTRL_SECURE_WRITE_BIT |
> + DWMCI_MPSCTRL_NON_SECURE_READ_BIT |
> + DWMCI_MPSCTRL_VALID |
> + DWMCI_MPSCTRL_NON_SECURE_WRITE_BIT);
Yuvaraj,
Just one thing to check.
ch#0 and #1 of three hosts are only valid for SMU control.
Did you consider #2 host?
It seems not.
Thanks,
Seungwon Jeon
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -107,6 +135,7 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_resume(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct dw_mci *host = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>
> + dw_mci_exynos_priv_init(host);
> return dw_mci_resume(host);
> }
>
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
