On Wednesday 21 August 2013 12:22 AM, Hein Tibosch wrote:
Hi,
[ added some people from TI ]
On 8/7/2013 6:05 PM, majianpeng wrote:
V2:
clean up code.
V1:
www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@vger.../msg93239.html
We found a problem when we removed a working sd card that the irqaction
of omap_hsmmc can sleep to 3.6s. This cause our watchdog to work.
In func omap_hsmmc_reset_controller_fsm, it should watch a 0->1
transition.But avoiding endless waiting, it used loops_per_jiffy as the timer.
Tried on a OMAP4460:
This can easily be replicated: just withdraw an SD-card and the kernel
will get blocked during more than 3 seconds.
Calling OMAP_HSMMC_READ() in this loop makes it last so long.
The function waits for a 0=>1, followed by a 1=>0 transition.
The value of 1 always comes, but in most cases the code is just too
slow to detect it. The first loop will only stop when (i == limit)
The code is:
while ((!(OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, SYSCTL) & bit))
&& (i++ < limit))
cpu_relax();
But generanly loops_per_jiffy as a timer,it should like:
while(i++ < limit)
cpu_relax();
I found for the long time case, the while-opeation stoped because 'i == limit'.
Because added some code, so the duration became too longer than
MMC_TIMEOU_US(20ms).
The software can't monitor the transition of hardware for thi case.
Becasue those codes in ISR context, it can't use timer_before/after.
I divived the time into 1ms and used udelay(1) to instead.
It will cause do additional udelay(1).But from my test,it looks good.
Reported-by: Yuzheng Ma <mayuzheng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Yuzheng Ma <mayuzheng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Hein Tibosch <hein_tibosch@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jianpeng Ma <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c | 25 +++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
index 1865321..bbda5ed 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
@@ -973,9 +973,8 @@ static inline void omap_hsmmc_dbg_report_irq(struct omap_hsmmc_host *host,
static inline void omap_hsmmc_reset_controller_fsm(struct omap_hsmmc_host *host,
unsigned long bit)
{
- unsigned long i = 0;
- unsigned long limit = (loops_per_jiffy *
- msecs_to_jiffies(MMC_TIMEOUT_MS));
+ /*change to 1ms,so we can use udelay(1)*/
+ unsigned long limit = MMC_TIMEOUT_MS * 1000;
OMAP_HSMMC_WRITE(host->base, SYSCTL,
OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, SYSCTL) | bit);
Checked here: the SRC-bit indeed becomes high.
After the test 'features & HSMMC_HAS_UPDATED_RESET', the bit has
become low again already.
Changing to order of statements worked for me, but for Jianpeng Ma
this didn't work (timings are 'on the edge').
I think 1->0 transition is missed sometimes and waiting until timeout,
Jianpeng Ma, which SoC are you testing ?
This reset function is also called while mounting a card and then 'SRC'
will be high long enough (more than 100 loops). It is after withdrawing
the card that the reset is performed extremely fast.
@@ -984,17 +983,15 @@ static inline void omap_hsmmc_reset_controller_fsm(struct omap_hsmmc_host *host,
* OMAP4 ES2 and greater has an updated reset logic.
* Monitor a 0->1 transition first
*/
- if (mmc_slot(host).features & HSMMC_HAS_UPDATED_RESET) {
- while ((!(OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, SYSCTL) & bit))
- && (i++ < limit))
- cpu_relax();
- }
- i = 0;
-
- while ((OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, SYSCTL) & bit) &&
- (i++ < limit))
- cpu_relax();
-
+ if (mmc_slot(host).features & HSMMC_HAS_UPDATED_RESET)
+ while (!(OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, SYSCTL) & bit)
+ && limit--)
+ udelay(1);
In this way, the loop will only last about 'MMC_TIMEOUT_MS' ms
and my WDT doesn't get triggered :-)
+ limit = MMC_TIMEOUT_MS * 1000;
+ while ((OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, SYSCTL) & bit) && limit--)
+ udelay(1);
+
if (OMAP_HSMMC_READ(host->base, SYSCTL) & bit)
dev_err(mmc_dev(host->mmc),
"Timeout waiting on controller reset in %s\n",
Anybody an opinion on this?
Thanks, Hein
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
