On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I guess my overall question is: if there are no actual implementations > of multislot, shouldn't we kill it and simplify the code a whole lot? > If someone out there has a real multislot device they can step back in > and do it more correctly? > > Of course we need to find someone to actually go through and do the > killing of multislot, but finding that person might be easier if there > was some agreement that it was good to do. There clearly seems to be no in-tree users of multislot. If someone new comes in, we have the code in the history and can revert the removal (or at least use it as reference for re-introduction). I vote for removing it. It adds really annoying complexity for something that nobody uses. -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
