Hi Felipe, On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Joel A Fernandes <agnel.joel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Felipe, > > > On Friday, June 14, 2013, Felipe Balbi wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 02:54:33PM -0500, Joel A Fernandes wrote: >> > Hi Tony, Vaibhav, >> > >> > >> I just doublechecked MMC rootfs on bone and evmsk as it's the >> > >> standard >> > >> smoke test. My EVM is intermittent now so trying to coax it to power >> > >> up >> > >> to reverify. >> > >> >> > > >> > > Matt, >> > > >> > > Your branch is working for me, I tested it on EVM. Not sure what is >> > > wrong with manual rebasing >> > > I did yesterday. I will try to nail-down root-cause here. >> > > >> > > And you can submit the next version fixing the comments I have given. >> > >> > The only comment I could find in the whole discussion was adding of >> > the interrupts property. I tested I don't have any problem booting >> > with Matt's patch, without having the interrupts property. >> >> might very well be, but we want to figure out why adding "intrrupts" >> causes issues. Why does it have to come through hwmod ? You might have >> uncovered a real problem which needs fixing. Besides, at the end of the > You are right, adding interrupts property to DT node causes problems (driver probe doesn't take place). Will debug further on Monday. Thanks, Joel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
