Re: lockdep dump on devtree_lock (involving esdhc)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/11/2013 05:33 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> I get the following lockdump output on p2020rdb using
> v3.10-rc5-43-g34376a5.  While it's not particularly polite for the
> esdhc driver to be calling OF functions while holding another lock which
> can be acquired from interrupt context, why is devtree_lock usually
> acquired in an irqsafe manner but sometimes not?
> 
> Both types of usage were added by the same commit:
> 
> commit d6d3c4e656513dcea61ce900f0ecb9ca820ee7cd
> Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Wed Feb 6 15:30:56 2013 -0500
> 
>     OF: convert devtree lock from rw_lock to raw spinlock
> 
> Stephen, you asked about this here:
> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1302.1/01383.html
> 
> Did you ever get an answer?

I believe that was fixed by c31a0c0 "of: fix recursive locking in
of_get_next_available_child()".
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux