On 06/05/13 22:27, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Here are 3 patches to support runtime PM for BYT SD cards >> >> Please note that these patches are dependent upon 2 gpio patches >> that are in linux-next and linux-gpio but not the mmc tree. >> Those patches are: >> >> author Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2013-04-03 10:56:54 (GMT) >> committer Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> 2013-04-11 22:31:18 (GMT) >> commit 12028d2d216220618f76284af5f8ed510b11da55 (patch) >> gpiolib-acpi: introduce acpi_get_gpio_by_index() helper >> >> author Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> 2013-04-09 13:57:25 (GMT) >> committer Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> 2013-04-10 21:41:17 (GMT) >> commit 7fc7acb9a0b0ff3ffdf21818fe0735ebaf4fecb8 (patch) >> gpio / ACPI: Handle ACPI events in accordance with the spec >> >> I think those patches are queued for 3.10. >> >> cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > > No they are currently not, and will as it looks right now *not* be in v3.10 due > to a screwup from my side, and that screwup walking the ladder to > Torvalds where it exploded. So he's not pulling the GPIO tree this merge > window. > > So just sit back and synchronize this for v3.11 (surely they can be taken > through the GPIO tree if Chris gives his ACK on them). 3.11 is fine, but one of the patches: [PATCH 1/3] mmc: sdhci: add ability to stay runtime-resumed if the card is powered up really should be in the mmc tree. It would be simpler if the above 2 ACPI GPIO patches made it to 3.10 or went via the mmc tree. Adding Rafael in case he can still take them for 3.10. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html