On 04/05/2013 02:01 PM, Alexandre Pereira da Silva wrote: > I just sent a patch to fix the same thing to the list, without seeing > yours first. > > But in the discussion, I learned that I should be checking for > broken-cd instead of non-removable. I'm not subscribed to linux-mmc and on http://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mmc I just see Marek's Reviewed-by. Can you point me to the discussion? In fact my board has an eMMC, which is soldered to the board and the card detect is not connected...the documentation says: > - broken-cd: There is no card detection available; polling must be used. > - non-removable: non-removable slot (like eMMC); assume always present. I see no point in using polling if the card is in deed always present. > Would you like for me to send a separate patch for broken-cd or do you > prefer to check on yours when you resubmit? If your card detect is not connected and the card is removable, you should use broken-cd and base you patch on mine. Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
