Hi, On Wed, Mar 27 2013, Ulf Hansson wrote: > I noticed you merged this. I thought the idea was to use the rootwait > or rootdelay? That's necessary before the patch, but it would be better if we didn't have to pass rootwait, all else being equal. > Moreover, this patch will have bad impact on booting the kernel, since > every host device that has scheduled a detect work from it's probe > function will also wait for it to finish. Even if it is the boot > device of not. If this is needed, I would prefer that a host cap is > used. I see, you're worried about a performance regression where every boot takes longer than it used to while MMC quiesces. That's fair. Do you think you could tell me how much delay this adds to a boot for you, so that we can consider whether the usability improvement is worth it? If the delay's significant, I agree with you and will revert this patch. Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx> <http://printf.net/> One Laptop Per Child -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
