Great..
I also found this problem and sent the similar patch at mailing.
But i think this patch is more generic.
Acked-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@xxxxxxxxxxx>
On 01/22/2013 07:48 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
> This patch is derived from 'mmc: fix async request mechanism ...'.
> According as async transfer, a request is handled with twice mmc_start_req.
> When the card is removed, the request is actually not issued in the first
> mmc_start_req [__mmc_start_data_req]. And then mmc_wait_for_data_req_done
> will come in the next mmc_start_req. But there is no event for completions.
> wake_up_interruptible is needed in __mmc_start_data_req for the case of
> removed card.
>
> Signed-off-by: Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> index 8b3a122..997b257 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> @@ -350,6 +350,7 @@ static int __mmc_start_data_req(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_request *mrq)
> mrq->host = host;
> if (mmc_card_removed(host->card)) {
> mrq->cmd->error = -ENOMEDIUM;
> + mmc_wait_data_done(mrq);
> return -ENOMEDIUM;
> }
> mmc_start_request(host, mrq);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
