Have any other opinion?
On 01/22/2013 09:18 PM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> When card removed, then didn't complete the previously data.
> (It didn't wakeup any interrupt.)
> If card is removed, then we can assume to complete the previously data.
> And wakeup the interrupt for wait_event of data.
>
> This problem is produced when sd-card is removed.(Sd-card is running some operation)
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <Kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> index 8b3a122..bc1d627 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> @@ -515,17 +515,26 @@ struct mmc_async_req *mmc_start_req(struct mmc_host *host,
> mmc_pre_req(host, areq->mrq, !host->areq);
>
> if (host->areq) {
> - err = mmc_wait_for_data_req_done(host, host->areq->mrq,
> - areq);
> - if (err == MMC_BLK_NEW_REQUEST) {
> - if (error)
> - *error = err;
> - /*
> - * The previous request was not completed,
> - * nothing to return
> - */
> - return NULL;
> - }
> + err = mmc_wait_for_data_req_done(host, host->areq->mrq,
> + areq);
> + if (err == MMC_BLK_NEW_REQUEST) {
> + if (error)
> + *error = err;
> + /*
> + * The previous request was not completed,
> + * nothing to return
> + */
> + return NULL;
> + } else if (err == MMC_BLK_NOMEDIUM && areq) {
> + struct mmc_context_info *ctnx = &host->context_info;
> + /*
> + * If crad is removed,
> + * then we didn't wait for data completed.
> + * Assume that data-recieve done.
> + */
> + ctnx->is_done_rcv = true;
> + wake_up_interruptible(&ctnx->wait);
> + }
> /*
> * Check BKOPS urgency for each R1 response
> */
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
