Hi, On Thu, Jan 24 2013, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > I tried to keep this binding similar to others, that I proposed in "mmc: > add DT bindings for more MMC capability flags." Actually, the above is > indeed wrong, I would call it "cap-sdio-irq." And in that patch I tried to > keep binding names resembling as closely as possible respective MMC_CAP_* > flags. I think, it would have been better if "enable-sdio-wakeup" and > "keep-power-in-suspend" were also named, following the same rule, but it's > too late now. Anyway, I'm not too concerned about the names. We can use > "enable-sdio-irq" too if you like. I see. Okay, let's go with your proposed cap-* for each MMC_CAP_*, and the pm_caps can stay as they are. Thanks! - Chris. -- Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx> <http://printf.net/> One Laptop Per Child -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
