Re: [PATCH] mmc: tmio: add barriers to IO operations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 24 Jan 2013, Paul Mundt wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 05:46:18PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > Without barriers SDIO operations fail with runtime PM enabled.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc.h |   14 ++++++++------
> >  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc.h b/drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc.h
> > index d857f5c..ad1a1c6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc.h
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc.h
> > @@ -159,19 +159,20 @@ int tmio_mmc_host_runtime_resume(struct device *dev);
> >  
> >  static inline u16 sd_ctrl_read16(struct tmio_mmc_host *host, int addr)
> >  {
> > -	return readw(host->ctl + (addr << host->bus_shift));
> > +	return ioread16(host->ctl + (addr << host->bus_shift));
> >  }
> >  
> >  static inline void sd_ctrl_read16_rep(struct tmio_mmc_host *host, int addr,
> >  		u16 *buf, int count)
> >  {
> > +	wmb();
> >  	readsw(host->ctl + (addr << host->bus_shift), buf, count);
> >  }
> >  
> Some reason to not use ioread16_rep() and friends?

Aren't they "raw," i.e. without barriers:

#define ioread16_rep(p,d,c)	__raw_readsw(p,d,c)

?

Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux