On Tue, 22 Jan 2013, Lee Jones wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jan 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:20:10AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > > On Tue, 22 Jan 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:53:42AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >> From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> There are currently two instances of the ios_handler being used. > > > > > >> Both of which mearly toy with some regulator settings. Now there > > > > > >> is a GPIO regulator API, we can use that instead, and lessen the > > > > > >> per platform burden. By doing this, we also become more Device > > > > > >> Tree compatible. > > > > > > > > > > > > Russell, > > > > > > > > > > > > Why is this patch in your tree with Ulf as the Author? > > > > > > > > > > This is because of the way Russell's patch tracker works, it sets > > > > > Author: to the name of the person using the patch tracker and > > > > > discards the From: field in the beginning of the patch which > > > > > git am will conversely respect. > > > > > > > > Actually, the reverse. It does now respect the From: line, but the > > > > From: line will be ignored for all notifications about the patch > > > > because the patch system was never built to parse the actual comments > > > > when sending out the email notifications. > > > > > > So what do I have to do to reaffirm myself as the author? > > > > I'd need to recommit the patch with the right information, which isn't > > that easy to do. > > Are you saying that you won't do it? :) > > Is there anything I can do to make the process easier? Thinking about this a little more. Is it easier to remove it from your tree altogether? Only I have a small "ARM: ux500: " patch-set which directly relies on this patch. I could take it in via ARM-SoC without any fear of ordering issues. The alternative is for me to wait until this hits Mainline, or for you to take in the remainder of the patch-set via your patch tracker. The first option would be my preference. -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
