Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: add regulator_is_dummy function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 06:36:36AM -0500, Kevin Liu wrote:
> 2013/1/7 Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> > No, we've been through this repeatedly.  Whatever problem you're trying
> > to bodge around is going to be a problem with some real physical
> > regulators too.

> Then the only way is MUST define the regulator rather than let dummy
> regulator handle it, right?

To repeat once again, dummy regulators should never be used in
production.  They are purely a crutch to help get boot going - it is
expected that things like this and cpufreq might fail.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux