On 12/19/2012 11:45 AM, Luciano Coelho wrote: >> Well, we still haven't got the foggiest idea what the actual problem is >> beyond that it's probably related to the 32kHz clock in some way (unless >> it was one of the other reverts that coincidentally made a difference, >> but we don't know what they were) so it's unlikely that just randomly >> implementing clock support is going to fix anything immediately here. > > This is exactly what I had to revert (as I mentioned in the other email, > I had to revert the other patches otherwise compilation would break): > > 0e8e5c34 "regulator: twl: Remove references to 32kHz clock from DT bindings" > e76ab829 "regulator: twl: Remove references to the twl4030 regulator" > 029dd3ce "regulator: twl: Remove another unused variable warning" Yeah. 32k clock is not provided by twl. As I said I need to take a look at CCF to see if it already there. If it is clock driver + mapping + patch for wl12xx should fix the issue you are facing. > Let me know if you need more info. BTW: have you happened to ubdate u-boot recently? There is a nice easter egg added there: f3f98bb ARM: OMAP4/5: Do not configure non essential pads, clocks, dplls. Which means that _essential_ clocks and pads are no longer configured. -- Péter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
