Hi Russell and Chris, I would like to propose a change of how we handle mmci patches to be merged. Instead of going through Russell's arm tree, I would like Chris to handle the merge through his mmc tree. The reason is simply that patches can have dependencies to the protocol layer and in seems a bit unnecessary to wait for another merge window to occur to handle these patches. Moreover, if most of the mmci patches goes through Chris mmc tree, I believe we would minimize the number of possible conflicts. Russell will then only need to NACK patches to prevent them from being merged. Do you think this could be and acceptable setup for both of you? Kind regards Ulf Hansson -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
