Hi, On Fri, Oct 26 2012, Johan Rudholm wrote: > 2012/10/26 Philip Rakity <prakity@xxxxxxxxxx>: >> >> On Oct 26, 2012, at 11:31 AM, Johan Rudholm >> <johan.rudholm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> + default: >>> + str = "invalid"; >> >> would "is unknown" be a better str ? > > Maybe... Actually, I just followed the standard in the function, all > other strings default to "invalid" when the definition is missing. So > if I change this, then I should also change the rest of the strings in > the function. I will do this if we think it's worth the effort, but is > it? Thanks, pushed to mmc-next for 3.8 -- let's handle string renaming separately to this patch. - Chris. -- Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx> <http://printf.net/> One Laptop Per Child -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html