Hi Sangho, If you really must do this kind of clean up patches; from my point of view I would suggest you to collect them in one "mmc: core: Code cleanup" patch instead. Kind regards Ulf Hansson On 18 October 2012 18:58, Sangho Yi <antiroot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I fixed lines over 80 characters per line. > > Signed-off-by: Sangho Yi <antiroot@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/mmc/core/sdio_io.c | 6 ++++-- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_io.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_io.c > index 8f6f5ac..c5f53d8 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_io.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sdio_io.c > @@ -80,7 +80,8 @@ int sdio_enable_func(struct sdio_func *func) > timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(func->enable_timeout); > > while (1) { > - ret = mmc_io_rw_direct(func->card, 0, 0, SDIO_CCCR_IORx, 0, ®); > + ret = mmc_io_rw_direct(func->card, 0, 0, SDIO_CCCR_IORx, 0, > + ®); > if (ret) > goto err; > if (reg & (1 << func->num)) > @@ -664,7 +665,8 @@ void sdio_f0_writeb(struct sdio_func *func, unsigned char b, unsigned int addr, > > BUG_ON(!func); > > - if ((addr < 0xF0 || addr > 0xFF) && (!mmc_card_lenient_fn0(func->card))) { > + if ((addr < 0xF0 || addr > 0xFF) && > + (!mmc_card_lenient_fn0(func->card))) { > if (err_ret) > *err_ret = -EINVAL; > return; > -- > 1.7.9.5 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html