On Thursday, September 20, 2012, Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 19 September 2012 19:09, Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tuesday, September 18, 2012, Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF > >> +/* given a slot id, find out the device node representing that slot */ > >> +static struct device_node *dw_mci_of_find_slot_node(struct device *dev, u8 slot) > >> +{ > >> + struct device_node *np; > >> + const __be32 *addr; > >> + int len; > >> + > >> + if (!dev || !dev->of_node) > >> + return NULL; > >> + > >> + for_each_child_of_node(dev->of_node, np) { > >> + addr = of_get_property(np, "reg", &len); > >> + if (!addr || (len < sizeof(int))) > >> + continue; > >> + if (be32_to_cpup(addr) == slot) > >> + return np; > >> + } > >> + return NULL; > >> +} > >> + > >> +/* find out bus-width for a given slot */ > >> +static u32 dw_mci_of_get_bus_wd(struct device *dev, u8 slot) > >> +{ > >> + struct device_node *np = dw_mci_of_find_slot_node(dev, slot); > >> + u32 bus_wd = 1; > >> + > >> + if (!np) > >> + return 1; > >> + > >> + if (of_property_read_u32(np, "bus-width", &bus_wd)) > >> + dev_err(dev, "bus-width property not found, assuming width" > >> + " as 1\n"); > >> + return bus_wd; > >> +} > >> +#else /* CONFIG_OF */ > >> +static u32 dw_mci_of_get_bus_wd(struct device *dev, u8 slot) > >> +{ > >> + return 1; > >> +} > >> +static struct device_node *dw_mci_of_find_slot_node(struct device *dev, u8 slot) > >> +{ > >> + return NULL; > >> +} > >> +#endif /* CONFIG_OF */ > >> + > >> static int dw_mci_init_slot(struct dw_mci *host, unsigned int id) > >> { > >> struct mmc_host *mmc; > >> struct dw_mci_slot *slot; > >> + u8 bus_width; > >> > >> mmc = mmc_alloc_host(sizeof(struct dw_mci_slot), host->dev); > >> if (!mmc) > >> @@ -1782,6 +1830,7 @@ static int dw_mci_init_slot(struct dw_mci *host, unsigned int id) > >> slot->id = id; > >> slot->mmc = mmc; > >> slot->host = host; > >> + host->slot[id] = slot; > >> > >> mmc->ops = &dw_mci_ops; > >> mmc->f_min = DIV_ROUND_UP(host->bus_hz, 510); > >> @@ -1806,8 +1855,18 @@ static int dw_mci_init_slot(struct dw_mci *host, unsigned int id) > >> mmc->caps2 = host->pdata->caps2; > >> > >> if (host->pdata->get_bus_wd) > >> - if (host->pdata->get_bus_wd(slot->id) >= 4) > >> - mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA; > >> + bus_width = host->pdata->get_bus_wd(slot->id); > >> + else if (host->dev->of_node) > >> + bus_width = dw_mci_of_get_bus_wd(host->dev, slot->id); > >> + else > >> + bus_width = 1; > >> + > >> + switch (bus_width) { > >> + case 8: > >> + mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA; > >> + case 4: > >> + mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA; > >> + } > >> > >> if (host->pdata->quirks & DW_MCI_QUIRK_HIGHSPEED) > >> mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_SD_HIGHSPEED | MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED; > >> @@ -1852,7 +1911,6 @@ static int dw_mci_init_slot(struct dw_mci *host, unsigned int id) > >> else > >> clear_bit(DW_MMC_CARD_PRESENT, &slot->flags); > >> > >> - host->slot[id] = slot; > >> mmc_add_host(mmc); > >> > >> #if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS) > >> @@ -1944,16 +2002,74 @@ static bool mci_wait_reset(struct device *dev, struct dw_mci *host) > >> return false; > >> } > >> > > The following CONFIG_OF block can be put together in upper CONFIG_OF . > > The placement of device tree related code is considering the logical > structure and flow of the code. So maybe we can just retain the below > code here for now. > > > > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF > >> +static struct dw_mci_of_quirks { > >> + char *quirk; > >> + int id; > >> +} of_quirks[] = { > >> + { > >> + .quirk = "supports-highspeed", > >> + .id = DW_MCI_QUIRK_HIGHSPEED, > >> + }, { > >> + .quirk = "broken-cd", > >> + .id = DW_MCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION, > >> + }, > >> +}; > >> + > >> +static struct dw_mci_board *dw_mci_parse_dt(struct dw_mci *host) > >> +{ > >> + struct dw_mci_board *pdata; > >> + struct device *dev = host->dev; > >> + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; > >> + int idx; > >> + > >> + pdata = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pdata), GFP_KERNEL); > >> + if (!pdata) { > >> + dev_err(dev, "could not allocate memory for pdata\n"); > >> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > >> + } > >> + > >> + /* find out number of slots supported */ > >> + if (of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "num-slots", > >> + &pdata->num_slots)) { > >> + dev_info(dev, "num-slots property not found, " > >> + "assuming 1 slot is available\n"); > >> + pdata->num_slots = 1; > >> + } > >> + > >> + /* get quirks */ > >> + for (idx = 0; idx < ARRAY_SIZE(of_quirks); idx++) > >> + if (of_get_property(np, of_quirks[idx].quirk, NULL)) > >> + pdata->quirks |= of_quirks[idx].id; > >> + > >> + if (of_property_read_u32(np, "fifo-depth", &pdata->fifo_depth)) > >> + dev_info(dev, "fifo-depth property not found, using " > >> + "value of FIFOTH register as default\n"); > >> + > >> + of_property_read_u32(np, "card-detect-delay", &pdata->detect_delay_ms); > >> + > >> + return pdata; > >> +} > >> + > >> +#else /* CONFIG_OF */ > >> +static struct dw_mci_board *dw_mci_parse_dt(struct dw_mci *host) > >> +{ > >> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); > >> +} > >> +#endif /* CONFIG_OF */ > >> + > >> int dw_mci_probe(struct dw_mci *host) > >> { > >> int width, i, ret = 0; > >> u32 fifo_size; > >> int init_slots = 0; > >> > >> - if (!host->pdata || !host->pdata->init) { > > "!host->pdata->init" is removed. > > Please check it. > > I have checked again in mmc-next branch and "init" is still there. I mean that there is no condition whether "host->pdata->init" is present or not, unlike origin code. In this patch this condition is removed. We don't need it anymore? > > Thanks, > Thomas. > > > > > > Thanks, > > Seungwon Jeon > > > >> - dev_err(host->dev, > >> - "Platform data must supply init function\n"); > >> - return -ENODEV; > >> + if (!host->pdata) { > >> + host->pdata = dw_mci_parse_dt(host); > >> + if (IS_ERR(host->pdata)) { > >> + dev_err(host->dev, "platform data not available\n"); > >> + return -EINVAL; > >> + } > >> } > >> > >> if (!host->pdata->select_slot && host->pdata->num_slots > 1) { > >> -- > >> 1.6.6.rc2 > >> > >> -- > >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in > >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > > [...] > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html