Hi, On Mon, Sep 17 2012, Will Newton wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 3:23 AM, Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> This reverts commit 94c6cee91(Add check for IDMAC configuration). >> Synopsys says that only if internal dmac is not present, optional >> external dma interface is present. When internal dmac is present, >> '0' value in DMA_INTERFACE of HCON is reasonable. DMA_INTERFACE >> indicates external dma interface. And idmac initialization is >> prohibited now. So, let's revert this commit. >> >> CC: Girish K S <girish.shivananjappa@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 15 ++------------- >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > I think this revert is a good idea. The original patch tries to check > whether IDMAC is supported and falls back to PIO, but it is not clear > to me that HCON gives you the appropriate information to do this (at > least in my version of the manual, I have not tried to clarify this > with Synopsys). Also falling back to PIO mode seems like it would > provide pretty awful performance, I would not expect to see instances > of this block with no DMA support anywhere other than FPGA so > configuring with IDMAC without it's presence would be a serious > misconfiguration in any case. > > Acked-by: Will Newton <will.newton@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, pushed to mmc-next for 3.7. - Chris. -- Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx> <http://printf.net/> One Laptop Per Child -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html