Hi Ulf and Chris, Could you have any opinion? If you have no more, could you merge the patch for eMMC5.0? Best Regards, Jaehoon Chung On 08/29/2012 08:59 PM, Kyungmin Park wrote: > Hi Ulf, > > On 8/29/12, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Jaehoon, >> >> On 28 August 2012 06:33, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Hi Ulf, >>> >>> This patch is to support eMMC5.0.(already discussing on eMMC5.0.) >>> Revision value is defined the 0x7 into ext_csd register.(in eMMC5.0's >>> case) >> >> Until the spec is really set we should not add some new code for this, >> it does not make sense to kind of guess. > It's not guess. it's determined and will be discussed at JEDEC soon. > > Revision 1.7 (for MMC V5.0) > > Thank you, > Kyungmin Park >> >>> >>> And case of Quirks is preparation patch to prevent the problem that should >>> exist. >>> That Quirks can also use for backward compatibility. >>> (if card is greater version than eMMC4.5 and need to use only eMMC4.5 >>> feature? >>> then can use quirks and known_rev.) >> >> It is just speculations about potential problems with eMMC 5.0. I >> think we can leave this to later, if/when we see a need for it. >> >> Kind regards >> Ulf Hansson >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
