>> +static inline void exynos_set_clk_drv_sample(struct dw_mci *host,
>> + struct mmc_ios *ios)
>> +{
>> + u32 regs, ratio;
>> +
>> + regs = mci_readl(host, EXYNOS_CLKSEL);
>> + ratio = SDMMC_GET_DIV_RATIO(reg);
>> + if (!ratio) {
>> + regs &= ~SDMMC_CLK_RESET_DRV_SAMPLE;
>> + regs |= ratio;
>> + if (ios->timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_DDR50)
>> + regs |= host->pdata->ddr_timing;
>> + else
>> + regs |= host->pdata->sdr_timing;
>
> Ah right, I see you're using them from a different patch. It feels wrong
> to platform specific data within the general platform data structure as
> it would be there unused for every other platform. Perhaps it would be
> better to have an outer exynos platform data struct which contains the
> standard one, and then use container_of to access it using the pointer
> to the inner one. Does that make sense?
I will check this. thanks for comment..
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
>
>> + } else
>> + regs &= ~SDMMC_CLK_RESET_DRV_SAMPLE;
>> +
>> + mci_writel(host, EXYNOS_CLKSEL, regs);
>> +}
>> +
>> +#endif /* _EXYNOS_DW_MMC_H */
>>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
