On 08/22/2012 04:17 AM, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Aug 22 2012, Shawn Guo wrote: >> The following is what I have on my mind. >> >> broken-cd cd-gpios implication >> ------------------------------------------- >> no no SDHCI CD >> no yes GPIO CD >> yes no NO CD / Broken CD >> yes yes Invalid >> >> yes: property presents >> no: property does not present > > This matches Mitch's last suggestion exactly -- I think we're all agreed > on these properties now. The only remaining question is how to handle > the pinctrl for CD in Thomas's case. Sorry if this has already been mentioned, but I assume the standard non-removable property overrides any of those, or is invalid in combination with any of those? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html