The "head removal" branch in the condition is never used in any code path in ext4 since the function only caller ext4_ext_rm_leaf() will make sure that the extent is properly split before removing blocks. Note that there is a bug in this branch anyway. This commit removes the unused code completely and makes use of ext4_error() instead of printk if dubious range is provided. Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/ext4/extents.c | 21 ++++----------------- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c index 7f5fe66..4d0084e 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c @@ -2339,23 +2339,10 @@ static int ext4_remove_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, *partial_cluster = EXT4_B2C(sbi, pblk); else *partial_cluster = 0; - } else if (from == le32_to_cpu(ex->ee_block) - && to <= le32_to_cpu(ex->ee_block) + ee_len - 1) { - /* head removal */ - ext4_lblk_t num; - ext4_fsblk_t start; - - num = to - from; - start = ext4_ext_pblock(ex); - - ext_debug("free first %u blocks starting %llu\n", num, start); - ext4_free_blocks(handle, inode, NULL, start, num, flags); - - } else { - printk(KERN_INFO "strange request: removal(2) " - "%u-%u from %u:%u\n", - from, to, le32_to_cpu(ex->ee_block), ee_len); - } + } else + ext4_error(sbi->s_sb, "strange request: removal(2) " + "%u-%u from %u:%u\n", + from, to, le32_to_cpu(ex->ee_block), ee_len); return 0; } -- 1.7.7.6 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html