Hi, On Thu, Jul 19 2012, Girish K S wrote: > Looks like a better solution than earlier one. > Reviewed By: Girish K S <girish.shivananjappa@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks. > Chris, > How about the holes created by removal of caps2 macros. Will they be > adjusted to follow the sequence or left as it is for future use. There actually isn't a hole in caps2, since yesterday I told Seungwon and Maya that I think the packed-write patches are not ready for 3.6 and probably should wait another cycle: http://marc.info/?l=linux-mmc&m=134259666416161&w=2 I'll be removing them from mmc-next, unless something changes. There aren't any other caps creating a hole in caps2. There's a hole in caps1, though. I think we'll just wait for the next patches that want caps to take the place of the hole in caps1 without renumbering any extant caps. Let me know if you disagree. Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx> <http://printf.net/> One Laptop Per Child -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
