Hi, On Wed, Jun 20 2012, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Johan Rudholm <jrudholm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> 2012/6/20 Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx>: >>> >>> Would it be impossible to add a partition table to mmcblkXbootY, >>> or just unlikely? >> >> I believe this is just an unlikely scenario since the boot partitions >> are supposed to contain boot code and also because of their relatively >> small size (a few MBs), but there is no technical problem. Perhaps it >> should be left up to the user? > > Like we add a Kconfig bool option "support partition scanning on boot > partitions" and then we default that to "n", so systems that really > want to do that can turn it on the day they need it. I'm not so happy with adding Kconfig options for configuring driver behavior -- it's usually a failure to just do the right thing. If we think that people might want to use a partition table on their boot partitions then we should just support doing that, as we do now. In fact, the original patch submission for supporting boot partitions used a Kconfig entry for turning on boot partition support, but we decided to ditch the Kconfig entry and made it just happen by default. I think we should continue that precedent and avoid a new entry here. Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx> <http://printf.net/> One Laptop Per Child -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
