2012/6/7, Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On 6/7/2012 4:05 PM, Namjae Jeon wrote: >> This change is not meant for improving MMC throughput; it's basically >> > about becoming fair to other threads/interrupts in the system. By >> > holding >> > spin lock and interrupts disabled for longer duration, we won't allow >> > other threads/interrupts to run at all. > As i have mentioned in commit text, > > This change is not meant for improving MMC throughput; it's basically > about becoming fair to other threads/interrupts in the system. By holding > spin lock and interrupts disabled for longer duration, we won't allow > other threads/interrupts to run at all. Okay, this patch means latency will be improved on multi thread environment. Looks reasonable to me. Reviewed-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxx> > > Regards, > Subhash > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
