On Mon, 21 May 2012, Marek Vasut wrote:
> The write-protect GPIO is inverted on some boards. Handle such case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Lothar Waßmann <LW@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/mxs-mmc.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mxs-mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mxs-mmc.c
> index 277161d..9bfd08e 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/mxs-mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mxs-mmc.c
> @@ -164,16 +164,23 @@ struct mxs_mmc_host {
> spinlock_t lock;
> int sdio_irq_en;
> int wp_gpio;
> + int wp_inverted:1;
I think, many mmc drivers could use such a flag, so, I proposed this
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg14018.html
and I'm planning to respin that entire patch-series, taking reviews into
account. However, that specific patch doesn't depend on anything, so, it
can be taken directly. Then drivers would just use the new CAP2 flag,
instead of adding similar flags to their private data. Another advantage
of having that flag centrally is, that it will enable its use from the
slot function helper module
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg14031.html
which I'll also respin soon.
Thanks
Guennadi
> };
>
> static int mxs_mmc_get_ro(struct mmc_host *mmc)
> {
> struct mxs_mmc_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
> + int ret;
>
> if (!gpio_is_valid(host->wp_gpio))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - return gpio_get_value(host->wp_gpio);
> + ret = gpio_get_value(host->wp_gpio);
> +
> + if (host->wp_inverted)
> + ret = !ret;
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static int mxs_mmc_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc)
> @@ -707,6 +714,7 @@ static int mxs_mmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct pinctrl *pinctrl;
> int ret = 0, irq_err, irq_dma;
> dma_cap_mask_t mask;
> + enum of_gpio_flags flags;
>
> iores = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> dmares = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_DMA, 0);
> @@ -785,7 +793,10 @@ static int mxs_mmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA;
> else if (bus_width == 8)
> mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA | MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA;
> - host->wp_gpio = of_get_named_gpio(np, "wp-gpios", 0);
> + host->wp_gpio = of_get_named_gpio_flags(np, "wp-gpios", 0,
> + &flags);
> + if (flags & OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW)
> + host->wp_inverted = 1;
> } else {
> if (pdata->flags & SLOTF_8_BIT_CAPABLE)
> mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA | MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA;
> --
> 1.7.10
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
