On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 11:58 AM, mani <manishrma@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> How about adding the AS_DMPG flag in the file -> address_space when getting
> a filemap_fault()
> so that we can treat the page fault pages as the high priority pages over
> normal read requests.
> How about changing below lines for the support of the pages those are
> requested for the page fault ?
>
>
> --- a/fs/mpage.c 2012-05-04 12:59:12.000000000 +0530
> +++ b/fs/mpage.c 2012-05-07 13:13:49.000000000 +0530
> @@ -408,6 +408,8 @@ mpage_readpages(struct address_space *ma
> &last_block_in_bio, &map_bh,
> &first_logical_block,
> get_block);
> + if(test_bit(AS_DMPG, &mapping->flags) && bio)
>
> + bio->bi_rw |= REQ_RW_DMPG
> }
> page_cache_release(page);
> }
> --- a/include/linux/pagemap.h 2012-05-04 12:57:35.000000000 +0530
> +++ b/include/linux/pagemap.h 2012-05-07 13:15:24.000000000 +0530
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ enum mapping_flags {
> #if defined (CONFIG_BD_CACHE_ENABLED)
> AS_DIRECT = __GFP_BITS_SHIFT + 4, /* DIRECT_IO specified on file op
> */
> #endif
> + AS_DMPG = __GFP_BITS_SHIFT + 5, /* DEMAND PAGE specified on file op
> */
> };
>
> static inline void mapping_set_error(struct address_space *mapping, int
> error)
>
> --- a/mm/filemap.c 2012-05-04 12:58:49.000000000 +0530
> +++ b/mm/filemap.c 2012-05-07 13:15:03.000000000 +0530
> @@ -1646,6 +1646,7 @@ int filemap_fault(struct vm_area_struct
> if (offset >= size)
> return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
>
> + set_bit(AS_DMPG, &file->f_mapping->flags);
> /*
> * Do we have something in the page cache already?
> */
>
> Will these changes have any adverse effect ?
>
Thanks for the example but I can't judge which of the two is the most
elegant or acceptable to maintainers.
I can test with your change and inform if it works.
> Thanks & Regards
> Manish
>
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 5:01 AM, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 07:53:00PM +0530, Venkatraman S wrote:
>> > From: Ilan Smith <ilan.smith@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >
>> > Add attribute to identify demand paging requests.
>> > Mark readpages with demand paging attribute.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Ilan Smith <ilan.smith@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Signed-off-by: Alex Lemberg <alex.lemberg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Signed-off-by: Venkatraman S <svenkatr@xxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> > fs/mpage.c | 2 ++
>> > include/linux/bio.h | 7 +++++++
>> > include/linux/blk_types.h | 2 ++
>> > 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/fs/mpage.c b/fs/mpage.c
>> > index 0face1c..8b144f5 100644
>> > --- a/fs/mpage.c
>> > +++ b/fs/mpage.c
>> > @@ -386,6 +386,8 @@ mpage_readpages(struct address_space *mapping,
>> > struct list_head *pages,
>> > &last_block_in_bio, &map_bh,
>> > &first_logical_block,
>> > get_block);
>> > + if (bio)
>> > + bio->bi_rw |= REQ_RW_DMPG;
>>
>> Have you thought about the potential for DOSing a machine
>> with this? That is, user data reads can now preempt writes of any
>> kind, effectively stalling writeback and memory reclaim which will
>> lead to OOM situations. Or, alternatively, journal flushing will get
>> stalled and no new modifications can take place until the read
>> stream stops.
>>
>> This really seems like functionality that belongs in an IO
>> scheduler so that write starvation can be avoided, not in high-level
>> data read paths where we have no clue about anything else going on
>> in the IO subsystem....
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Dave.
>> --
>> Dave Chinner
>> david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
