On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 03:47:00PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 03:14:00PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote: > > As IMX, basically i'd prefer to add pinctrl states in dts file at the > > same time within the patch or using a separate patch to add them before > > this series to avoid breaking the exist platforms. > > > > However i noted that for mxs, most drivers here are still not dt capable, > > so it may be ok to not add their pinctrl state at this time. > > > There no mxs driver on mainline that has been DT aware of. What I'm > going to do is to ask Arnd abandon the mxs/dt branch I sent him before > and send him an updated one with the whole mxs DT support based on > mxs common clk and pinctrl series. > > > But for the patch "serial: amba-pl011: adopt pinctrl support" since it is > > dt capable, so with this patch applied, the mx28 dt boot will fail. > > Maybe we should at least add pinctrl states for amba-pl011 first. > > > The updated mxs/dt will have pinctrl defined in dts for each device > that is converted to DT. > Well, i did not see amba-pl011 pinctrl states defined in this patch. But it would be ok if you can get it done and applied before this patch. > > > Shawn Guo (9): > > > ARM: mxs: enable pinctrl dummy states > > > serial: amba-pl011: adopt pinctrl support > > BTW, will this one break other platforms using this driver? > > > If the platforms do not turn on CONFIG_PINCTRL, they are fine. If they > turn on the support, they should provide pinctrl state either dummy or > real one. > Regards Dong Aisheng -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
