Hi Paul On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, Paul Mundt wrote: > On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 07:36:24PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > Polling for card hotplug events is a better option than using SDHI native > > hotplug interrupt, because the latter option forces the controller to stay > > permanently powered up and enabled. > > > > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx> > > --- > > > > It is a kind of an RFC. We do in general prefer SDHI polling to SDHI > > native hotplug detection for the above reason, but there might well be > > other reasons, why this is not a good idea in this specific case. If there > > are such, I'd love to hear about them. > > > I've not heard any more about this one way or the other, so should I > assume you still want it applied? At least we can revert it if one of > these cases pops up, and in the interim it's always preferable to lean > towards better power management for a default. Yes, agree, since noone objected so far (as if I really expected dozens of people to pay attention to random RFC patches on the sh list;-)) let's apply it. Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. Freelance Open-Source Software Developer http://www.open-technology.de/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
