On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 6:46 AM, Rabin Vincent <rabin@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 23:32, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> By reading the code you can easily see that the variables aren't >> actually used uninitialized, it's juts GCC that is unable to >> follow the code path and determine that they are initialized in >> all paths. > > If the mmc_switch(..SANITIZE_START..) returns -EIO and mmc_blk_reset() > returns 0, then the variables _are_ used uninitialized. Argh! You're right. (As usual.) But that makes me wonder if the code flow is even correct for sanitize. I'll have a closer look and come up with something better! Thanks, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
