On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 05:46:56PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Can you elaborate? I suggested the split in order to keep the ux500 > specific parts local to one file. With the device tree conversion, > we really want to have them out of the platform code, but sticking them > into the main driver seems wrong, too. You're talking about the data structures which describe what quirks to apply for the ux500 parts, rather than the actual quirks themselves. That's not a particularly clever thing to do because it separates out the selection of the works from the rest of the driver, which means simply searching for the flags to find out what's applied for what has to span several files. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
