Re: [PATCH 0/5] MMC: mmci: Provide bindings for Device Tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 15 March 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
> > I would like to see what the minimal required change is to support DT
> > for mmci without factorization.
> > 1. Minimal change in mmci.
> > 2. Add mmci_dt.c which contains the DT-populate code.
> > 
> > The factorization could be done as step 2 I think.
> > 
> > What do you say?
> 
> I'm wondering what the difference is as the work has already been done.
> 
> It was Arnd's suggestion to separate out the two types of variants, and
> I'm quite fond of the new (fully featured) layout.

Right, I usually prefer cleanups or other refactoring to be done first, and
then features added on top.

You could in theory add have just patches 3/4/5 all applied without
the refactoring, but that I would be worried that this causes dependencies
between the mmci driver and ux500 specific functionality like the
stedma40_filter function.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux