On 03/12/2012 10:32 AM, Grant Likely wrote: > On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:46:03 +0100, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 7:27 AM, Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Update gpio.txt based on recent discussions regarding interaction with the >>> pinctrl subsystem. >>> >>> Previously, gpio_request() was described as explicitly not performing any >>> required mux setup operations etc. >>> >>> Now, gpio_request() is explicitly as explicitly performing any required mux >>> setup operations where possible. In the case it isn't, platform code is >>> required to have set up any required muxing or other configuration prior to >>> gpio_request() being called, in order to maintain the same semantics. >>> >>> This is achieved by gpiolib drivers calling e.g. pinctrl_request_gpio() in >>> their .request() operation. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Grant can you take this one? I'd prefer for you to have a look at >> it as well. > > I've taken this one, but left the 2nd for Olof. Grant, did you take V2 of this patch? I assume not since you replied to V1. For reference, that's: http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/5/533 Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
