On 08/03/12 01:29, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> > > Make tmio_mmc call dev_pm_qos_expose_latency_limit() to expose > the PM QoS latency limit to user space and specify the initial > value of it as 100 microseconds. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc_pio.c | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > Index: linux/drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc_pio.c > =================================================================== > --- linux.orig/drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc_pio.c > +++ linux/drivers/mmc/host/tmio_mmc_pio.c > @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ > #include <linux/module.h> > #include <linux/pagemap.h> > #include <linux/platform_device.h> > +#include <linux/pm_qos.h> > #include <linux/pm_runtime.h> > #include <linux/scatterlist.h> > #include <linux/spinlock.h> > @@ -955,6 +956,8 @@ int __devinit tmio_mmc_host_probe(struct > > mmc_add_host(mmc); > > + dev_pm_qos_expose_latency_limit(&pdev->dev, 100); > + > /* Unmask the IRQs we want to know about */ > if (!_host->chan_rx) > irq_mask |= TMIO_MASK_READOP; > @@ -993,6 +996,8 @@ void tmio_mmc_host_remove(struct tmio_mm > || host->mmc->caps & MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE) > pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev); > > + dev_pm_qos_hide_latency_limit(&pdev->dev); Is it really necessary to hide the latency limit before destroying the device? Presumably QoS code could (or does) take care of it. > + > mmc_remove_host(host->mmc); > cancel_work_sync(&host->done); > cancel_delayed_work_sync(&host->delayed_reset_work); > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
