On 02/21/12 06:00, Yaniv Gardi wrote:
> @@ -922,6 +918,44 @@ out:
> return err ? 0 : 1;
> }
>
> +int mmc_blk_issue_sanitize_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq,
> + struct request *req)
> +{
> + struct mmc_blk_data *md = mq->data;
> + struct mmc_card *card = md->queue.card;
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + if (!(mmc_can_sanitize(card) && (mq->card->host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_SANITIZE))) {
> + pr_err("%s: SANITIZE is not supported", __func__);
> + err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + pr_info("%s: SANITIZE is supported", __func__);
These look like debug printks. Please remove them.
> +
> + mmc_sd_card_set_sanitize_in_progress(card);
> +
> + pr_info("%s: issueing SANITIZE command...", __func__);
> +
> + err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
> + EXT_CSD_SANITIZE_START, 1, 0);
> +
> + pr_info("%s: SANITIZE command returned...", __func__);
> +
> + if (err)
> + pr_err("%s: mmcblk: mmc_switch() failed. err=%d\n",
> + __func__, err);
> +
> + mmc_sd_card_set_sanitize_completed(card);
> +
> +out:
> + spin_lock_irq(&md->lock);
> + __blk_end_request(req, err, blk_rq_bytes(req));
> + spin_unlock_irq(&md->lock);
> +
> + return err ? 0 : 1;
> +}
> +
> static int mmc_blk_issue_flush(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
> {
> struct mmc_blk_data *md = mq->data;
> @@ -181,6 +186,11 @@ int mmc_init_queue(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct mmc_card *card,
> if (mmc_can_erase(card))
> mmc_queue_setup_discard(mq->queue, card);
>
> + if ((mmc_can_sanitize(card) && (host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_SANITIZE)))
> + mmc_queue_setup_sanitize(mq->queue);
> + else
> + pr_info("%s - card doesn't support sanitize", __func__);
debug printk again?
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
