On 02/14/2012 05:37 AM, Saugata Das wrote: > On 12 February 2012 02:27, Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, Feb 06 2012, Saugata Das wrote: >>> Thanks for the info. Perhaps the initial MMC-4.5 device samples do not >>> implement this command well. Yes, this feature is good to have in the >>> kernel. I shall wait for some more comments on the proposed >>> implementation before submitting the patch. >> >> I'm not very excited about merging features that offer no concrete >> benefit, because it just grows the kernel (and list of places where bugs >> can occur) for no benefit. So, it would be great if we could find a >> device that actually implements these contexts in a way that provides >> a performance benefit, to prove that adding the code is worthwhile. >> > > Completely agree with you. The purpose of proposing this > implementation under [RFC] was to trigger some discussion on how this > feature should be implemented. I agreed, too. i think Saugata's patch isn't completely we need the discussion to use this feature I will also check what need for this.. Thanks, Jaehoon Chung > >> Thanks, >> >> - Chris. >> -- >> Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx> <http://printf.net/> >> One Laptop Per Child > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
