Hi Vinod On Wed, 1 Feb 2012, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 09:59 +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > Hi Vinod > > > > Thanks for your reply. > > > > On Tue, 31 Jan 2012, Vinod Koul wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 10:34 +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: [snip] > > > > How would you like to do this? Don't you think, it would be good to allow > > > > both: either implement a dmaengine driver directly, exactly as all drivers > > > > are doing now, or use the additional helper library for suitable (simple) > > > > hardware types? I see it similar to I2C, where you either implement an I2C > > > > driver directly, or you use the bitbanging abstraction for simpler > > > > hardware. > > > I think it would be good to have both, this can be used by folks who > > > don't have sg support available. > > > > Ok, so, should I just rename the driver to sgsoft? Is this the only > > change, that you'd like to see? > That would be one :) > Also, I would review the other patch patches by today/tomorrow, you can > add any changes in next version as well Do I understand it right, that I'm waiting for your review before submitting the next version? Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. Freelance Open-Source Software Developer http://www.open-technology.de/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
