On Fri, 3 Feb 2012, Shimoda, Yoshihiro wrote:
> Hi Guennadi-san,
>
> 2012/02/03 7:19, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> [ snip ]
> >>
> >> Thank you for your comment.
> >>
> >> I investigaed the issue. I found out the renesas_usbhs driver may
> >> call tx_submit() in the callback() of the dma-simple finally.
> >
> > Sorry, in my first reply to this your email I misread the renesas_usbhs
> > for an issue with your new SUDMAC driver. Since this is not the case and
> > my patch seems to be causing a regression, I'll look at it.
>
> Thank you for the comment.
>
> I found out that if the "power_up" is 0 in the sample_tx_submit(),
> the pm_state will be changed to "PENDING".
> And then, even if the renesas_usbhs calls dma_async_issue_pending(),
> the dma-simple driver doesn't call the simple_chan_xfer_ld_queue().
> This is because the driver will call the simple_chan_xfer_ld_queue()
> when the pm_state is "ESTABLISHED" only.
>
> So I guess that we have to modify the simple_issue_pending().
Ok, I looked at this code, there's now a comment in simple_tx_submit():
if (power_up) {
...
} else {
/*
* Tell .device_issue_pending() not to run the queue, interrupts
* will do it anyway
*/
schan->pm_state = DMA_SIMPLE_PM_PENDING;
}
And that's exactly what should be happening: an interrupt should trigger
the IRQ thread should call simple_chan_xfer_ld_queue(), so, looks like the
interrupt is not coming? It's also strange, why and how it worked without
dma-simple? I don't think I changed that with the transition...
Investigating.
Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
