On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 07:00:51PM -0500, Chris Ball wrote: > Wolfram, do you have time to look at this? Looks like we need to expose > suspend/resume hooks to -pltfm users for this use case -- I don't think > any esdhc code should be in sdhci-pltfm.c. (I don't mind writing the > patch if you agree that that's the correct solution here.) I won't have time to look at it, but what you say sounds reasonable to me. Regards, Wolfram -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature