Hi Chris On Sun, 25 Dec 2011, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi Guennadi, > > On Sun, Dec 25 2011, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > >> This patch (3/4) no longer applies to mmc-next -- mind resending? > > > > This one should be ok. > > Seems to be worse, for some reason: > > patching file drivers/mmc/host/sh_mmcif.c > Hunk #2 succeeded at 189 (offset -5 lines). > Hunk #3 FAILED at 217. > Hunk #4 succeeded at 503 (offset -4 lines). > Hunk #5 FAILED at 780. > Hunk #6 FAILED at 802. > Hunk #7 FAILED at 835. > Hunk #8 succeeded at 908 (offset 6 lines). > Hunk #9 FAILED at 942. > Hunk #10 succeeded at 1044 with fuzz 2 (offset 11 lines). > Hunk #11 succeeded at 1246 (offset 11 lines). > Hunk #12 succeeded at 1351 (offset 11 lines). > Hunk #13 FAILED at 1376. > Hunk #14 succeeded at 1425 (offset 11 lines). > 6 out of 14 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/mmc/host/sh_mmcif.c.rej Hmmm, that's very weird - I rebased my patch series on top of your mmc-next from a couple of hours ago. Sorry for asking, but you've also applied the leading two patches from this series, right? This is what my log of this driver looks like now: 6bf5ca1 mmc: sh_mmcif: remove now superfluous sh_mmcif_host::data member 8777cc4 mmc: sh_mmcif: process requests asynchronously 0295d69 mmc: sh_mmcif: cosmetic clean up 74dfec8 mmc: sh_mmcif: process error interrupts first 9092a17 mmc: convert drivers/mmc/host/* to use module_platform_driver() Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. Freelance Open-Source Software Developer http://www.open-technology.de/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
