On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Philip Rakity <prakity@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Haojian, > > Should the APMU definitions be moved to a separate include for pxa168 and say given the name pxa168_apmu.h ? > > Same comment applies to all the register set since they are not really common. > > Philip I think it's unnecessary to create a new apmu.h. We can distinguish them by name in macro, as PXA168/MMP2. Thanks Haojian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
